Research Report No.1 - Appendix 5

CCRU home background on CCRU community relations equality and equity research

APPENDIX FIVE : TABULAR REPORT

Q3. In what year did you first conduct a monitoring exercise on the community background of employees

.
1985 OR
EARLIER
1986
1987
1988
1989
1990
SAMPLE
BASE NO.
TOTAL
2%
1%
1%
6%
19%
70%
371
SECTOR
PUBLIC SECTOR
3%
3%
6%
6%
18%
65%
32
PRIVATE SECTOR
2%
1%
1%
5%
19%
71%
339
COMPANY SIZE
<50
2%
1%
1%
4%
17%
76%
148
50-99
3%
1%
0%
3%
17%
76%
105
100 +
2%
2%
4%
11%
25%
55%
118



Q4. In Conducting the Monitoring Exercise in 1990 did you make use of the Fair Employment Code of Practice?

.
YES
NO
SAMPLE
BASE NO.
TOTAL
97%
3%
371
SECTOR
PUBLIC SECTOR
100%
0%
32
PRIVATE SECTOR
97%
3%
339
COMPANY SIZE
< 50
96%
4%
148
50 - 99
98%
2%
105
100 +
98%
2%
118



Q5 Did you find the code of practice . . . . . . . . . .

.
VERY
USEFUL
QUITE
USEFUL
NOT PARTIC.
USEFUL
NOT AT
ALL USEFUL
SAMPLE
BASE NO.
TOTAL
25%
64%
9%
2%
361
SECTOR
PUBLIC SECTOR
33%
64%
3%
0%
32
PRIVATE SECTOR
25%
64%
9%
2%
329
COMPANY SIZE
<50
25%
65%
8%
3%
142
50 - 99
20%
66%
14%
1%
103
100 +
32%
63%
5%
1%
116



Q6. In connection with your first statutory monitoring return in 1990 did you seek any advice or information from the Fair Employment Commission ?

.
YES
NO
SAMPLE
BASE NO.
TOTAL
41%
59%
371
SECTOR
PUBLIC SECTOR
80%
20%
32
PRIVATE SECTOR
39%
61%
339
COMPANY SIZE
< 50
41%
59%
148
50 - 99
39%
61%
105
100 +
45%
55%
118



Q7. What type of advice or information did you request from the FEC?

.
GEN
ASSIST
RESID
METHOD
CLASSIFY
CATEGORISE
MONITOR
EXCERISE
EMPLOYEE
ELIGIBILTY
RECRUIT
MENT
SAMPLE
BASE NO
TOTAL
57%
6%
12%
14%
10%
1%
160
SECTOR
PUBLIC
20%
18%
11%
34%
18%
0%
26
PRIVATE
61%
5%
13%
11%
9%
1%
134
COMPANY SIZE
< 50
62%
0%
10%
16%
10%
0%
61
50-99
57%
10%
15%
9%
6%
3%
42
100 +
44%
14%
14%
14%
14%
0%
57



Q8. How helpful did you find the advice/information given by the FEC ?

.
VERY
HELPFUL
QUITE
HELPFUL
NOT PARTIC.
HELPFUL
NOT AT
ALL HELPFUL
SAMPLE
BASE NO.
TOTAL
43%
52%
5%
* %
160
SECTOR
PUBLIC SECTOR
48%
41%
11%
0%
26
PRIVATE SECTOR
42%
53%
4%
1%
134
COMPANY SIZE
< 50
38%
57%
5%
0%
61
50-99
37%
57%
3%
3%
42
100+
55%
39%
6%
0%
57
(* less than 1%)



Q9. During 1990 and 1991 have you had any contact with the FEC on matters other than registration and monitoring ?

.
YES
NO
SAMPLE
BASE NO.
TOTAL
22%
78%
371
SECTOR
PUBLIC SECTOR
45%
55%
32
PRIVATE SECTOR
20%
80%
339
COMPANY SIZE
< 50
18%
82%
148
50 - 99
21%
79%
105
100 +
28%
72%
118



Q10. What type of contact was this and for what purpose ?

.
INVEST
COMPLAINT
GUIDE-
LINES
PRACTICE
CONSULT
SERVICES
UNFAIR
DISMISS
ATTRACT
APPLIC.
OTHER
SAMPLE
BASE NO
TOTAL
30%
18%
9%
8%
6%
5%
24%
83
SECTOR
PUBLIC SECTOR
13%
25%
6%
6%
0%
0%
50%
16
PRIVATE SECTOR
32%
17%
10%
8%
6%
5%
22%
67
COMPANY SIZE
< 50
33%
15%
12%
13%
0%
7%
20%
25
50 - 99
31%
14%
8%
5%
16%
4%
22%
21
100 +
26%
25%
7%
5%
4%
3%
30%
37



Q11 How satisfactory did you find the performance of the FEC in regard to these matters ?

.
VERY
SATIS.
QUITE
SATIS.
NOT PARTIC.
SATIS.
NOT SATIS.
AT ALL
SAMPLE
BASE NO.
TOTAL
37%
45%
13%
5%
83
SECTOR
PUBLIC SECTOR
31%
50%
6%
13%
16
PRIVATE SECTOR
38%
44%
14%
4%
67
COMPANY SIZE

<50
29%
58%
10%
3%
25
50-99
40%
34%
22%
4%
21
100 +
43%
39%
11%
7%
37


Q12. Did you apply for assistance under the Fair Employment Support Scheme?

.
YES
NO
SAMPLE
BASE NO.
SECTOR
PRIVATE SECTOR
56%
44%
339
COMPANY SIZE
< 50
50%
50%
142
50 - 99
49%
51%
101
100 +
64%
36%
96



Q13. Did you find the Fair Employment Support Scheme . . . . . . . . . .

.
VERY
USEFUL
QUITE
USEFUL
NOT PARTIC
USEFUL
NOT USEFUL
AT ALL
SAMPLE BASE NO.
TOTAL
56%
40%
4%
0%
194
SECTOR
PRIVATE SECTOR
56%
40%
4%
0%
194
COMPANY SIZE
<50
52%
44%
4%
0%
72
50-99
60%
36%
4%
0%
51
100+
56%
39%
5%
0%
71



Q14. In which of the following respects did you find the scheme useful ?

.PERSONNEL
PROCEDURES
MONITORING
INFO.
SYSTEMS
TRAINING
IN TESTS
OTHER
SAMPLE BASE NO
TOTAL
57%
62%
21%
17%
3%
185
SECTOR
PRIVATE SECTOR
57%
62%
21%
17%
3%
185
COMPANY SIZE
< 50
55%
64%
33%
14%
0%
71
50-99
64%
52%
11%
8%
2%
48
100 +
55%
66%
11%
30%
7%
66



Q15. Was the 1990 monitoring exercise an integral part of an overall equal opportunities policy in your company ?

.
YES
NO
SAMPLE BASE NO.
TOTAL
73%
27%
371
SECTOR
PUBLIC SECTOR
87%
13%
32
PRIVATE SECTOR
72%
28%
339
COMPANY SIZE
< 50
72%
28%
148
50 - 99
76%
24%
105
100 +
71%
29%
118



Q16. In addition to sex and religion do you monitor other aspects of equal opportunity such as marital status or disability ?

.
YES
NO
SAMPLE
BASE NO.
TOTAL
30%
70%
371
SECTOR
PUBLIC SECTOR
72%
28%
32
PRIVATE SECTOR
28%
72%
339
COMPANY SIZE
<50
28%
72%
148
50-99
24%
76%
105
100 +
42%
58%
118



Q17. In order to undertake the 1990 monitoring exercise and, more generally, comply with the new Fair Employment Legislation, did you appoint any additional staff ?

.
YES
NO
SAMPLE BASE NO.
TOTAL
8%
92%
371
SECTOR
PUBLIC SECTOR
19%
81%
32
PRIVATE SECTOR
8%
92%
339
COMPANY SIZE
< 50
4%
96%
148
50 - 99
5%
95%
105
100 +
19%
81%
118



Q18. How many additional staff and of what type did you employ? Fewer than 10 respondents answered this question. It would not be meaningful to present the results.

Q19 What is the annual cost of employing these additional staff members?
Only 6 respondents answered this question quoting costs ranging from below £7,000 to over £40,000. It would not be meaningful to present the results.

Q20 Did complying with the monitoring exercise involve any other additional costs to the company 7

YES
NO
SAMPLE BASE NO.
TOTAL
40%
60%
371
SECTOR
PUBLIC SECTOR
52%
48%
32
PRIVATE SECTOR
39%
61%
339
COMPANY SIZE
< 50
36%
64%
148
50 - 99
35%
65%
105
100 +
52%
48%
118



Q21 (PART A) Purpose of these additional costs


.
STAFF/
MANAGEMENT TIME
EXTRA
STATIONERY
OFFICE
EQUIP.
PRINT.
SET UP
COSTS
COMPU
OTHERS
SAMPLE
BASE NO
TOTAL
41%
27%
19%
18%
15%
13%
22%
152
SECTOR
PUBLIC SECTOR
41%
14%
11%
11%
22%
38%
27%
18
PRIVATE SECTOR
41%
28%
20%
18%
15%
12%
21%
134
COMPANY SIZE
< 50
38%
25%
23%
14%
20%
6%
18%
53
50 - 99
47%
31%
13%
22%
7%
6%
23%
37
100 +
42%
27%
20%
19%
15%
28%
26%
62



Q21. (PART B) Number of reported items of additional cost

.
<£1,000
£1,001-
5,000
£5,001-
10,000
£10,000
+
SAMPLE BASE NO. (employers stating
additional costs)
TOTAL
143
33
3
7
152
SECTOR
PUBLIC
11
8
2
5
18
PRIVATE
132
55
1
2
134
COMPANY SIZE
<50
62
4
0
1
53
50-99
37
5
0
0
37
100+
44
24
3
6
62




Q22. How many staff members were actually involved in conducting the monitoring exercise ?

.
1
2-3
4-5
6-8
9 +
SAMPLE
BASE NO.
TOTAL
40%
53%
5%
1%
1%
371
SECTOR
PUBLIC SECTOR
39%
47%
8%
3%
3%
32
PRIVATE SECTOR
40%
53%
5%
1%
1%
339
COMPANY SIZE
<50
44%
53%
1%
1%
1%
148
50-99
41%
53%
6%
0%
0%
105
100 +
33%
52%
10%
3%
1%
118



Q23 Did you adopt any structural organisation changes in order to carry out the monitoring exercise or as a result of it ?

.
YES
NO
SAMPLE
BASE NO.
TOTAL
13%
87%
371
SECTOR
PUBLIC SECTOR
27%
73%
32
PRIVATE SECTOR
13%
87%
339
COMPANY SIZE
< 50
13%
87%
148
50 - 99
11%
89%
105
100 +
17%
89%
118



Q24 Was a computer used to store/analyse information from your monitoring exercise ?

.
YES
NO
SAMPLE BASE NO.
TOTAL
17%
83%
371
SECTOR
PUBLIC SECTOR
62%
38%
32
PRIVATE SECTOR
15%
85%
339
COMPANY SIZE
< 50
7%
93%
148
50 - 99
14%
86%
105
100 +
39%
61%
118



Q25 In terms of importance, what type of priority would you say was given to the monitoring exercise ?

.
HIGH
MEDIUM
LOW
SAMPLE BASE NO.
TOTAL
45%
40%
15%
371
SECTOR
PUBLIC SECTOR
74%
26%
0%
32
PRIVATE SECTOR
43%
40%
17%
339
COMPANY SIZE
< 50
34%
47%
19%
148
50 - 99
46%
37%
17%
105
100 +
64%
30%
6%
118



Q26 Did you take any steps to encourage your employees to co-operate in the monitoring exercise ?

.
YES
NO
SAMPLE BASE NO.
TOTAL
51%
49%
371
SECTOR
PUBLIC SECTOR
80%
20%
32
PRIVATE SECTOR
49%
51%
339
COMPANY SIZE
< 50
39%
61%
148
50 - 99
53%
47%
105
100 +
68%
32%
118



Q27 What type of steps did you take ?

.
LETTER
STAFF
MEET.
LITER
ATURE.
MONITOR FORM
SEN. STAFF
MEET.
OTHER
SAMPLE
BASE NO
TOTAL
27%
20%
10%
9%
8%
26%
197
SECTOR
PUBLIC SECTOR
18%
11%
6%
9%
9%
47%
26
PRIVATE SECTOR
28%
21%
10%
8%
7%
26%
171
COMPANY SIZE
< 50
17%
22%
12%
13%
7%
29%
58
50-99
38%
26%
6%
4%
9%
17%
56
100 +
29%
14%
12%
7%
7%
31%
83



Q28 Did you consult with trade union representatives before undertaking the monitoring exercise?

.
YES
NO
NO UNION
SAMPLE
BASE NO.
TOTAL
26%
28%
46%
371
SECTOR
PUBLIC SECTOR
72%
28%
0%
32
PRIVATE SECTOR
24%
28%
48%
339
COMPANY SIZE
< 50
15%
31%
54%
148
50 - 99
16%
31%
53%
105
100 +
57%
18%
25%
118



Q29 How would you describe Trade Union Reaction in your workplace to the introduction of the 1989 Fair Employment Legislation?

.
SUPP-
ORTIVE
FAIR/
SATIS.
MIXED
UNENTHU
SIASTIC
RESISTANT
NEGATIVE
NO
REACTION
SAMPLE
BASE NO
TOTAL
49%
5%
1%
8%
3%
34%
213
SECTOR
PUBLIC SECTOR
71%
0%
6%
3%
0%
20%
32
PRIVATE SECTOR
47%
5%
0%
9%
3%
36%
181
COMPANY SIZE
<50
39%
3%
0%
9%
0%
49%
67
50-99
48%
2%
0%
7%
6%
37%
51
100+
61%
9%
2%
8%
5%
17%
95



Q30 Were there occupational groups/grades whose response to the monitoring exercise questionnaires seemed particularly low ?

.
YES
NO
SAMPLE
BASE NO.
TOTAL
8%
92%
371
SECTOR
PUBLIC SECTOR
20%
80%
32
PRIVATE SECTOR
7%
93%
339
COMPANY SIZE
< 50
6%
94%
148
50 - 99
8%
92%
105
100 +
11%
89%
118



Q31 Which groups were these?(low response.)

.
MANUAL
WORKERS
ALL
GROUPS
SENIOR
STAFF
UNION
MEMBERS
TEMP.
WORKERS
GROUP
5
GROUP
8
NO
SPEC.
SAMPLE
BASE
NO
TOTAL
47%
19%
13%
7%
6%
3%
2%
3%
34
SECT0R
PUBLIC SECTOR
86%
0%
0%
14%
0%
0%
0%
0%
7
PRIVATE SECTOR
41%
21%
15%
6%
7%
3%
2%
4%
27
COMPANY SIZE
<50
69%
31%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1
50 - 99
24%
9%
24%
0%
22%
10%
0%
12%
10
100 +
43%
14%
16%
20%
0%
0%
7%
0%
15



Q32 Were there any occupational groups / grades whose response to the monitoring exercise questionnaires seemed particularly high?

.
YES
NO
SAMPLE
BASE NO.
TOTAL
7%
93%
371
SECTOR
PUBLIC SECTOR
16%
84%
32
PRIVATE SECTOR
6%
94%
339
COMPANY SIZE
< 50
4%
96%
148
50-99
8%
92%
105
100+
10%
90%
118



Q33 Which groups were these ? (high response.)

.
ALL EMPLOY
SOCIAL SERVICE
SALARIED
WORKERS
ADMIN
STAFF
GROUPS
1,4,7,8,9.
MANUAL
WORKER
OTHER
SAMPLE
BASE NO.
TOTAL
65%
5%
8%
2%
8%
3%
9%
27
SECTOR
PUBLIC
64%
18%
0%
18%
0%
0%
0%
5
PRIVATE
66%
4%
8%
0%
9%
4%
10%
22
COMPANY SIZE
<50
80%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
21%
6
50-99
52%
0%
23%
0%
25%
0%
0%
7
100+
66%
13%
0%
6%
0%
7%
7%
14



Q34 Which principal method of monitoring did you use ?

.BASE
FIRST
SCHOOLS
SECOND
SCHOOLS
DIRECT
QUESTION
SAMPLE
NO.
TOTAL
16%
8%
76%
371
SECTOR
PUBLIC SECTOR
40%
16%
44%
32
PRIVATE SECTOR
14%
8%
78%
339
COMPANY SIZE
< 50
13%
9%
78%
148
50- 99
15%
7%
78%
105
100 +
21%
9%
70%
118



Q35-40 Difficulties in completing monitoring form

BASE
NOT
DIFF.
SLIGHTLY
DIFF.
QUITE
DIFF.
VERY
DIFF.
SAMPLE
NO.
CODING SCHOOLS
52%
38%
9%
1%
107
USING RESIDUARY METHOD
36%
45%
12%
6%
182
COUNTING APPLICANTS
32%
30%
20%
17%
89
COUNTING APPOINTEES
76%
17%
6%
1%
108
CODING INTO 9 GROUPS
40%
36%
20%
4%
280



Q41 Did the requirement of having to disclose to employees, in writing, the determination of their community background present difficulties?

.
YES
NO
SAMPLE
BASE NO.
TOTAL
8%
92%
371
SECTOR
PUBLIC SECTOR
11%
89%
32
PRIVATE SECTOR
8%
92%
339
COMPANY SIZE
< 50
4%
96%
148
50 - 99
13%
87%
105
100 +
10%
90%
118



Q42 Did you find the monitoring exercise

.
VERY
USEFUL
QUITE
USEFUL
NO STRONG
VIEWS
NOT PARTIC.
USEFUL
NOT AT ALL
USEFUL
SAMPLE
BASE NO
TOTAL
7%
20%
38%
15%
19%
371
SECTOR
PUBLIC SECTOR
27%
29%
30%
8%
6%
32
PRIVATE SECTOR
6%
19%
39%
16%
20%
339
COMPANY SIZE
< 50
3%
21%
41%
18%
17%
148
50 - 99
5%
11%
42%
11%
30%
105
100 +
17%
27%
29%
15%
12%
118



Q43 Would you say that complying with the Fair Employment Legislation has generally improved your personnel practices and procedures?

.
YES
NO
SAMPLE
BASE NO.
TOTAL
40%
60%
371
SECTOR
PUBLIC SECTOR
57%
43%
32
PRIVATE SECTOR
39%
61%
339
COMPANY SIZE
< 50
39%
61%
148
50 - 99
37%
63%
105
100 +
43%
57%
118



Q44 Would you say that complying with the Fair Employment Legislation has brought about changes in the way you go about recruiting staff ?

.
YES
NO
SAMPLE BASE NO.
TOTAL
41%
59%
371
SECTOR
PUBLIC SECTOR
37%
63%
32
PRIVATE SECTOR
41%
59%
339
COMPANY SIZE
<50
37%
63%
148
50 - 99
40%
60%
105
100 +
51%
49%
118



Q45 (PART A) Changes in staff recruitment practice

.
ADVER
TISING
INTER
VIEW.
UPDATED
FILING
RECRUIT
METHOD
NEW DOCU
MENTATION
NO WORD
OF MOUTH
APPROVED
AGENCIES
OTHER
SAMPLE
BASE NO
TOTAL
57%
18%
13%
12%
11%
10%
10%
2%
151
SECTOR
PUBLIC
30%
35%
8%
23%
20%
0%
0%
8%
12
PRIVATE
59%
17%
13%
12%
11%
11%
11%
2%
139
COMPANY SIZE
< 50
57%
20%
12%
9%
9%
12%
5%
2%
53
50 - 99
61%
9%
13%
9%
10%
15%
14%
0%
39
100 +
55%
23%
15%
19%
15%
3%
13%
3%
59



Q45 (PART B) Number of reported items of additional cost. Cost per annum

.
<£1,000
£1,001-
5,000
£5,001-
10,000
£10,000
+ SAMPLE BASE NO.
(Employers stating
costs of new practices)
TOTAL
68
20
4
3
101
SECTOR
PUBLIC
5
0
0
2
10
PRIVATE
63
20
4
1
91
COMPANY SIZE
<50
28
4
0
1
31
50-99
20
2
0
0
24
100+
20
14
4
2
46



Q46 As a result of the new Fair Employment Legislation have you introduced Affirmative Action Measures?

.
YES
NO
SAMPLE
BASE NO.
TOTAL
30%
70%
371
SECTOR
PUBLIC SECTOR
20%
80%
32
PRIVATE SECTOR
31%
69%
339
COMPANY SIZE
< 50
30%
70%
148
50 - 99
30%
70%
105
100 +
30%
70%
118



Q47 Have you introduced Affirmative Action Goals and Timetables?

.
YES
NO
SAMPLE
BASE NO.
TOTAL
48%
52%
107
SECTOR
PUBLIC SECTOR
43%
57%
7
PRIVATE SECTOR
48%
52%
100
COMPANY SIZE
< 50
40%
60%
44
50 - 99
69%
31%
30
100+
41%
59%
33



Q48 Have you already begun a review of Employment Composition and Practices which you are required to conduct at least once every three years ?

.
YES
NO
SAMPLE
BASE NO.
TOTAL
48%
52%
371
SECTOR
PUBLIC SECTOR
51%
49%
32
PRIVATE SECTOR
48%
52%
339
COMPANY SIZE
< 50
52%
48%
148
50 - 99
43%
57%
105
100 +
46%
54%
118



Q49-53 SUMMARY TABLE
Help required regarding Review of Employment Composition and Practices

.
NONE
A LITTLE
QUITE
A LOT
A GREAT
DEAL
SAMPLE
BASE NO
CONTENT & STRUCTURE
27%
56%
14%
4%
371
CATCHMENT AREAS
37%
46%
11%
6%
371
FAIR PARTICIPATION
34%
50%
11%
5%
371
AFFIRMATIVE ACTION
36%
50%
10%
5%
371
GOALS & TIMETABLES
39%
47%
10%
5%
371



Q49 Help required on content and structure of the review

.
NONE
A LITTLE
QUITE
A LOT
A GREAT
DEAL
SAMPLE
BASE NO
TOTAL
27%
56%
14%
4%
371
SECTOR
PUBLIC SECTOR
15%
71%
11%
3%
32
PRIVATE SECTOR
27%
55%
14%
4%
339
COMPANY SIZE
< 50
29%
52%
14%
5%
148
50 - 99
31%
54%
12%
3%
105
100 +
17%
66%
14%
3%
118



Q50 Help required working out catchment areas

.
NONE
A LITTLE
QUITE
A LOT
A GREAT
DEAL
SAMPLE
BASE NO
TOTAL
37%
46%
11%
6%
371
SECTOR
PUBLIC SECTOR
20%
44%
21%
14%
32
PRIVATE SECTOR
38%
46%
10%
6%
339
COMPANY SIZE
< 50
40%
45%
11%
4%
148
50 - 99
38%
45%
10%
7%
105
100 +
29%
49%
13%
8%
118



Q51 Help required with the determination of Fair Participation

.
NONE
A LITTLE
QUITE
A LOT
A GREAT
DEAL
SAMPLE
BASE NO
TOTAL
34%
50%
11%
5%
371
SECTOR
PUBLIC SECTOR
13%
60%
18%
8%
32
PRIVATE SECTOR
35%
49%
11%
5%
339
COMPANY SIZE
< 50
34%
49%
11%
6%
148
50-99
44%
42%
8%
6%
105
100 +
22%
61%
15%
3%
118



Q52 Help required with Affirmative Action Measures

.
NONE
A LITTLE
QUITE
A LOT
A GREAT
DEAL
SAMPLE
BASE NO
TOTAL
36%
50%
10%
5%
371
SECTOR
PUBLIC SECTOR
20%
58%
10%
11%
32
PRIVATE SECTOR
37%
49%
10%
4%
339
COMPANY SIZE
<50
39%
48%
8%
5%
148
50 - 99
37%
47%
10%
5%
105
100 +
29%
56%
11%
4%
118



Q53 Help required setting goals and timetables

.
NONE
A LITTLE
QUITE
A LOT
A GREAT
DEAL
SAMPLE
BASE NO
TOTAL
39%
47%
10%
5%
371
SECTOR
PUBLIC SECTOR
30%
43%
13%
14%
32
PRIVATE SECTOR
39%
47%
10%
4%
339
COMPANY SIZE
< 50
44%
42%
10%
4%
148
50 - 99
38%
48%
10%
4%
105
100 +
31%
55%
9%
5%
118



Q54 Who would you look to in order to provide such help?

.
FEC
PRIVATE
CONSULTANTS
OWN
STAFF
OTHER
SAMPLE
BASE NO
TOTAL
72%
20%
15%
1%
310
SECTOR
PUBLIC SECTOR
85%
6%
42%
11%
31
PRIVATE SECTOR
71%
21%
13%
1%
279
COMPANY SIZE
< 50
71%
20%
15%
2%
116
50-99
76%
17%
12%
0%
84
100 +
69%
23%
17%
2%
110


© CCRU 1998-1999
site developed by: Martin Melaugh
page last modified:
Back to the top of this page